

More
than 60 A.R.A. Legislative Caucus delegates, A.R.A. staffers, A.R.A. General Counsel
William T. Stephens and members of the Stephens Law Firm met in Washington, D.C., April
27-30 to pursue action on the 1997 A.R.A. legislative agenda. The association is focusing
particular attention on three of the nine agenda items: product liability, estate tax -
the so-called "death tax" - and capital gains tax reform.
For
each of these three primary agenda items, special "issue teams" appointed by
A.R.A. President Pam McKenney are concentrating attention on key members of Congress in
order to present the A.R.A. position more forcefully than in the past.
This
month Rental Management presents the A.R.A. agenda and position statements.
Additional caucus coverage and an update on the agenda will be in the August issue, which
is published in July.
The A.R.A. Legislative Agenda
Product
liability reform: A.R.A. supports a uniform product liability law that clearly defines
the responsibilities of manufacturers, sellers and users of products for product-related
injuries. Uniformity will reduce legal and insurance costs, lower product prices and make
U.S. products more competitive internationally.
Excessive
damage awards have driven the cost of liability insurance to unreasonable levels, inflated
prices, discouraged innovation and damaged U.S. competitiveness.
State
liability standards vary so much that a claimant could win a product liability suit in one
state but lose an identical suit in another. Uniformity would help stabilize the insurance
market by helping manufacturers assess their risks more effectively.
Legal
costs and increased insurance premiums that result from unjustified lawsuits are also at
issue; these problems cost the rental industry millions every year.
Reform legislation favored by A.R.A. would create a uniform product liability law, make
sellers liable only for harm caused by their own negligence, treat product rentors like
retailers, abolish joint and several liability, provide defenses against alteration or
misuse of products, cap punitive damages and eliminate unjustified lawsuits.
Death
taxes: A.R.A. supports the repeal of federal estate and gift taxes, or "death
taxes." These are actually taxes on entrepreneurship and discourage capital
formation, which is the key to economic growth and job creation. If these taxes cannot be
repealed, then A.R.A. supports reducing them by raising the unified estate and gift tax
exemption to $1 million and allowing families to exclude the first $1 million of
family-owned business assets from estates and taxing the next $2.5 million at half the
current rate. These measures will make it easier for small business owners to keep their
businesses in the family.
Capital
gains: A.R.A. supports reducing the capital gains tax rates for individuals and
corporations by 50 percent for each tax bracket and indexing the value of capital assets
to account for inflation. This would encourage capital formation and create employment
opportunity, as well as expanding production of goods and services, spurring innovation
and improving U.S. competitiveness internationally.
A.R.A. contends that the current tax system punishes entrepreneurship, savings and
investment and puts U.S. citizens at a disadvantage against industrialized competitors
abroad.
Income
tax reform: A.R.A. supports total replacement of the present income tax system with a
tax system that is based on revenue collection, equality, simplicity, administrative
efficiency and nonpartisanship. The A.R.A. contends that the present tax code is a garbled
hodgepodge of complex and discriminatory rules patched together by social engineers over
some 80 years for the purpose of redistribution of income and savings from those who
produce them to those who don't.
Balanced
budget: A.R.A. supports a constitutional amendment that would impose fiscal discipline
on Congress' freedom to tax and spend, and discourage Congress from balancing the budget
with higher levels of taxation. In fact, since 1969, government spending has grown faster
than federal revenues. A.R.A. contends that these deficits have been financing failed
policies that sap private investment, increase family taxes and give little in return.
OSHA
reform: A.R.A. supports a major overhaul of OSHA, contending that OSHA regulations
should be subjected to risk assessment and a cost/benefit analysis on an industry-specific
basis; performance-based exemptions from routine inspections and cooperative enforcement
procedures should be adopted; financial penalties for first-time, minor offenses and
specified paperwork violations should be abolished and a grace period should be allowed
for correction of certain hazards. A.R.A. opposes added regulatory and record-keeping
burdens, worker participation in enforcement decisions, higher fines and criminal
penalties and the reporting of unrelated observations to other agencies.
Funding for the agency should be focused on safety awareness, counseling and technical
assistance for employers, the A.R.A. says.
Campaign
financing: A.R.A. supports elimination of mandatory contributions from an
organization's members and significantly limiting funds raised for political
party-building rather than for particular candidates.
Social
Security: A.R.A. supports immediate and long-term modification of the Social Security
system, to place it on a sound actuarial basis so the United States will be able to keep
its contractual obligations to American workers. A.R.A. opposes a solution that relies
heavily upon increasing withholding taxes. A.R.A. contends that workers should have the
choice of establishing private accounts and contributing to them instead of being forced
into the government's Social Security system. The government should be allowed to invest
in the equities markets in order to grow trust fund holdings. Without reform, the current
situation will continue to get more critical, and in 2030, two active workers will be
supporting each retiree.
Citizen
protection from federal regulatory abuse: A.R.A. supports requiring federal agencies
to make a cost/benefit analysis, perform risk assessments and conduct an analysis of the
impact of taking private property before issuing regulations.
The A.R.A. further supports federal compensation to citizens for reduction of the fair
market value of their private property, should it be taken or its use restricted, and
supports the right of property owners to arbitrate valuation, as well as to recover
attorneys' fees.
Citizens'
Bill of Rights: A.R.A. supports this proposal to protect those who are being inspected
or investigated by a federal agency.