Home


Features


Columns


Editorial


Departments


Event & Party
Management


Counter & Yard
Management


Rate Cards/
Media Kits


Classified
Advertising


E-mail Letters to the Editor


Subscriptions


Staff


About Rental Management


Advertisers


Archives


Search


Contact Us


RentalPulse


 

 

Find a Rental Store

 

Click here to view our Terms of Use



Click here to view our Privacy Policy

 

Copyright © 2001
 American Rental Association
All Rights Reserved

 

Features

March 2001

Brown Rental finds keys to two big locks: how to compete and how to hire

BY PAMELA MILLS-SENN

By 1997, business had gotten so bad that Brad Bengson, president of Brown Rental in Boise, Idaho, was looking for buyers for the company that he had owned for more than 18 years. The consolidations had finally caught up with him, as one small rental company after another in his area was taken over by the large, publicly traded companies. Whereas once his competition consisted of locally owned businesses, now five nationals had moved in, driving rental prices down by almost 50 percent and siphoning customers from his once-thriving aerial/high lift division.

In addition to lifts, Brown Rental has two other divisions: small contractors/homeowner tools and party equipment and supplies. But with this new pressure on one of his most lucrative markets, his company was sinking fast and Bengson believed that selling was his only option.

The problem was, he recalls, the value of his business had dropped to such an extent that he could not attract an acceptable offer. Although he didn’t realize it at the time, his luck was about to change.

“Around this time,” Bengson recalls, “I attended a seminar led by Don Taylor, who wrote Up Against the Wal-Marts and writes a monthly column in Rental Management. After his presentation, I asked if I could speak with him for a moment about my business. I told him what was going on, and after talking with him, I realized I was in better shape than I thought. This meeting changed my perspective. Before, I thought my business was a lost cause, but after this, I began to feel that there was a chance.”
Not much later, Bengson ran across Brenda Wood, Ph.D., a Boise business consultant and owner of HR Diversified, a human resources consulting company. Impressed by her background and credentials, he hired her to help him turn his business around. During the two years-plus they’ve been working together, his company has undergone significant and profitable changes.

“Her approach was to focus on the employee aspect of my business,” he says. “She told me that although the national companies had financial resources that I didn’t have, I had a greater opportunity to compete by offering value-added customer service.

“But she told me that to do this, I would have to stop hiring bodies and focus on hiring the right people for the job.”

Given the extremely tight employee market, Bengson was apprehensive about making his interview process any more stringent, but he went along with her suggestions.
His first challenge was replacing the manager for his

aerial lift division. He placed a blind advertisement in the newspaper, one that did not mention his company’s name.

“We wanted to avoid having qualified people automatically rule us out as being too small to fully utilize their skills or meet their wage demands,” he explains.

His new interview process, devised by Wood, was structured and objective. Each applicant was given the same questions and the responses were scored. The job would be offered to the applicant who accumulated the highest number of points.

As it turns out, Bengson hired someone who, under his previous interview system — which was based on gut feelings — he probably would not have considered. But this turned out to be a fortuitous choice.

“His skills started to show right away, and we started to get back some of the business we had lost,” Bengson says. “He had the knowledge we needed to help us compete against the nationals.”

The manager alerted Bengson to the fact that some of the large competitors were selling their old lift equipment at “unbelievable prices.” He suggested that rather than buying new equipment as they had always done, Bengson should consider purchasing the used equipment, and theorized that after reconditioning, the equipment could be rented out at cheaper — but still profitable — rates, attracting price-driven customers back to Brown Rental.

Bengson tested this theory with just a few pieces. Pleased, he got a loan and doubled the size of his fleet.

“Even rented out at lower rates than our new equipment, we make the cost back in a year,” he says. “We work with equipment brokers, stick with the two brands we have always carried and buy equipment that’s no more than five years old.

“Now, we buy all of our equipment from the national companies and get a better return on our investment than we did before they came to town. We took what we thought was the enemy and made them our friend.

“And because of their aggressive advertising about the advantages of renting, they have brought new customers to the market and, consequently, to my business.”

Bengson still had to improve his hiring of entry-level employees, something he had always found especially challenging. Not only was he competing for the same non-skilled labor that many other companies were trying to attract, but his employees also had to be drug-free, get along well with the public, have clean driving records and be able to do physically demanding work.

Again, Wood helped him create an interview process that was objective and designed to quickly eliminate unsuitable applicants. Those who did not have clean driving records or indicated a reluctance to drug test were automatically disqualified.

Applicants who passed this first-stage requirement were given a pre-employment test designed to measure, among other skills, their ability to follow directions and find street addresses. Those who passed underwent a reference check.

The next step was an interview designed to assess customer-service skills and the ability to function as team players, in addition to other

proficiencies. Passing applicants were then drug-tested. The entire process took one or two days.

This helped him find the right

people, but retention was still a concern. Wood suggested a sign-on bonus.

“The first full day a new hire works, they get a check for $50,” Bengson explains. “After two months, they get $100. At the end of three months, if they pass their performance evaluation, they receive $150.

“And, if an existing employee recommends someone and this person is still there by the end of six months, the referring employee gets a $200 bonus. This has really helped us to get quality people.”

Wood also advised Bengson to regularly evaluate employees, something he had not previously done. Employees are now evaluated every quarter the first year, every six months the second year, and then once a year after that via the “360-degree assessment” method. This includes evaluations by peers as well as superiors, and self-evaluation, too. Plus, supervisors are evaluated by their subordinates.

According to Bengson, employees look forward to evaluations, because they represent an opportunity to significantly increase their income.

Other strategies he used to improve retention include providing medical benefits, giving annual cost-of-living raises and promoting from within.

“Our involuntary turnover has practically stopped,” Bengson says. “Now, we’re letting people go for poor performance rather than them leaving us.

“And since we’ve got the best people for the job, we’re serving our customers better and have become more competitive against big and small rental companies alike. This year our business has increased by 25 percent over last year.

“But most importantly, it has made running my business fun again. Now I’m in control. It’s no longer a case of the tail wagging the dog.” 

       


February 2001