Home


Features


Columns


Editorial


Departments


Event & Party
Management


Counter & Yard
Management


Rate Cards/
Media Kits


Classified
Advertising


E-mail Letters to the Editor


Subscriptions


Staff


About Rental Management


Advertisers


Archives


Search


Contact Us


RentalPulse


 

 

Find a Rental Store

 

Click here to view our Terms of Use



Click here to view our Privacy Policy

 

Copyright © 2001
 American Rental Association
All Rights Reserved

 

Features

June 2001

SEMINARS IN PRINT

Can the independent rental
company compete? — YES!

BY DAN KAPLAN


Editor’s Note: The following presentation was given at the American Rental Association Convention in Orlando, Fla., in February by Dan Kaplan of Daniel Kaplan Associates and former president of Hertz Equipment Rental Co. His consulting firm advises corporations on strategies for entering equipment rental and assists existing rental companies from independent stores to multi-national organizations on improving operations and financial performance. This is the first of a three-part series.

 

Part I

A small rental company can compete against a rental giant if it focuses on fundamentals. However, I have been to more than 100 rental yards in the past three years, and I would say that fewer than 5 percent are really doing it right. People want to be competitive, but they don’t run their rental operations efficiently and strategically and don’t use the software and the assets they have.

So let’s take a very fundamental, back-to-basics approach to the rental business. I can assure you that if you do what I’m saying — and it’s not complicated, it’s very much basics — your rental operation will improve.

In one rental company I saw a piece of equipment that I knew was a problem. The company paid $200,000 for it, but didn’t have the software to analyze the utilization rate and the returns on it. When we went to the accounting department and looked at the numbers, they were burning away $35,000 a year — just as if they had thrown the money out the window. The company was losing money and didn’t know how to turn the situation around.

I went into a rental company that was doing maybe $600,000 in annual revenue. The owner was sitting behind the counter. The store was not clean and it was disorganized. I said, “I can help you.” The guy said, “There’s nothing I can do.”

Now, if you believe that, you’re never going to improve. I said, “You need a salesman. You have a salesman here?” He said no, he couldn’t afford a salesman. I told him that’s why he was never going to get out of the bind he was in. We’ll get back to that.

But first, please understand this: for the most part, your competitor is not the giant rental company. Your competitor is the big box. The giant rental company is after a big industrial or national construction customer. They’re not after homeowners or small contractors. You think you’re competing with them, but you’re not. They’re not into customers who are doing, let’s say, $15,000 a year or less. They’ll take that customer, but they’re not targeting that. They’re into larger customers.

The big box is your competitor. The big box can hurt you. The big box is after the same customer you’re after.

Let’s take a look at how a large rental company is organized. There’s a president and then several distinct areas of responsibility — a chief financial officer; a VP, marketing; a VP, fleet operations, who does all the buying and selling of equipment; a VP, field operations; and under that, regional managers, controllers, sales directors and so on — experts in different areas, all attacking the business. What they do that you don’t do and you could do is ‰ From Page 41 they constantly attack their business, trying to improve it — working at measurements and finding ways of improving, looking at utilizations, finding out what equipment is renting, which equipment isn’t renting and doing something about it.

Big rental companies have between five and 10 regions and the regions are essentially independent profit companies. Why do they do this? To bring management intensity down to the store level so they can see what’s going on and effect change. In a typical region would be eight to 25 branches; or in a very large giant, a region may have 100 to 120 branches, broken down into districts.

But big boxes are organized independent of each other. They do not share equipment, they compete city by city and they do not drive utilization. The rental giants drive utilization by moving equipment between stores. They use their software to move their equipment.

One of the real keys to success in the rental business is driving time utilization to affect rental rates and looking at asset utilization and making moves. So they move it. The big box has a fleet of equipment and the stuff sits. So they really are working somewhat at a disadvantage in that they don’t move the equipment to drive utilization, and if something breaks they don’t really have the capability of repairing it.

Also, they cannot store the larger equipment outside. So they’re not going to go into light towers and 185-cfm air compressors and even mini-excavators and skid-steer loaders — they can’t display and store it.

But they’re dangerous to the small rental store because they are very, very price-competitive and probably the low-cost producer — but only for a limited product offering.

Can the typical A.R.A. member — the independent rental company — compete against the rental giant and the big box? Yes.

Let’s look at the purchase price, the depreciation schedule, the interest rate and then the time-utilization assumptions. I would say that a rental giant buys on an average of probably 12 percent better than you are, and may be getting extended warranties, some marketing support — some enhancements you’re not getting. But the main thing is, they are strategic buyers.

But you go to the A.R.A. show, you walk around, you see something at a good price — a show special — and you buy it. Next year you come and see something and you buy that. You are building a totally inconsistent fleet. You don’t think about what you’re going to do, you don’t fleet-plan what you’re going to do — and you don’t build relationships with the vendors.

If you went up to a vendor and said, “I’m a small buyer, but I’m going to stay consistent from year to year and I want to fix on your company. How can I work with you? I want a relationship with you.” That vendor will work with you — not just the rental giants.

But you buy this, you buy that, you have spare parts all over the place — it’s inconsistent, you’re not buying intelligently. It’s within everybody’s wherewithal to be a strategic buyer. You just have to think and plan and not jump around.

Whoever it is you want to deal with, form a relationship and make a commitment — I don’t care if you’re buying $100,000 a year, stay in a strategic direction and form a relationship and let them know that is where you are coming from, and they will work with you.

All of the major rental companies depreciate their equipment over the useful life of the asset and many independents basically expense the equipment. From an accounting point of view, they have an advantage over you because they’re taking like one-seventh of the cost with a 10-percent residual. So from an accounting perspective, I think you are putting yourself at a penalty. You really need to work with your own CPA to understand how to establish your books and account for the assets — and know what the machines are really costing you. Your software can also help you here.

The giants have an advantage on interest rates. They’re probably on average of at least 3 percent better than you are on the cost of interest. And then they apply a debt-to-equity ratio. So let’s say a company has $500 million in assets. They have like a million worth of equity and they borrow the rest, so if the interest rate is, say, 10 percent on a four-to-one debt-to-equity ratio, they would be basically paying interest of 8 percent — so they’re sort of mitigating some of their interest costs. This is important when you figure out what it costs to put out a piece of equipment.

Now, dollar utilization is rental revenue divided by first cost of equipment. The big industrial- or construction-oriented rental companies run around 43 percent and the ones who are less construction-oriented run in the high 60s. Their time utilization averages about 65 percent. When I was at Hertz, every single day I knew my utilizations. You can’t run a rental company without knowing your utilizations — I can assure you that all the major rental companies know what they’re doing every single day. They are able to drill down on any piece of equipment and see the time utilization, the ROI rate, in various sections of the country. You have the software to do this, except you haven’t taken the time to learn to use it to help you run your business.

I would say that the average A.R.A. member’s dollar utilization is probably around 125 percent. So if you have an inventory of $500,000, your rental revenue is probably in the range of $625,000 or $650,000. But your fixed overhead as a percentage of revenue is much higher. Your time utilization is very low.

A lot of rental dealers pride themselves that they have whatever a customer wants to rent, even if they rent it once a year. That does not make sense to me. Why in the world would you want to have something that you couldn’t put out and make money on every day? I have dedicated myself to looking for assets that have weak ROIs and get them out of the fleet. I don’t want one thing that isn’t going to make me money.

This is really the heart of understanding the business. If you have a piece of equipment out on rent, there are really two parts of the cost — direct costs and indirect costs. Direct costs are depreciation, interest, parts and labor. Everybody has that. Let’s say you have a $10,000 machine and that rents for $400 a month. Essentially $200 a month is going to cover depreciation, interest, parts and labor. The next 37 percent — or roughly $134 — covers your indirect costs; that’s your operating expenses — your facility, cost of sales, marketing administration.

You really need to understand what it costs to put out a given piece of equipment so that if you want to be competitive against a large company on rate, you can figure out what’s going on.

On an incremental basis, if you didn’t charge yourself that indirect cost, your cost to put out a machine or piece of equipment would be less than it is for a rental giant. It just depends on how one applies indirect costs.

So if you can raise your fleet level — in other words, if you can go from $500,000 to $700,000, get $200,000 more fleet in there — your direct costs are going to move, your indirect costs are not going to move, and you become incrementally more profitable.

Dig into what I’m saying, because it’s the fundamentals of how to increase profitability in a rental center. If you have one store or you have 500 stores, the same principle applies: every day, figure out how to put more equipment into that fixed-cost operation. It is very, very important to understand what it costs to put out a given piece of equipment.

Your rototiller may have a basic dollar utilization of 250 percent, but because of all of the costs involved in handling it, the cleaning and how many rental agreements you have to write and the processing of it, it may not be a really cost-effective item. I could show you that I could put a backhoe out at a 43-percent dollar utilization and for the money, make more money than you can with rototillers because I put it out in the month of March and I won’t see it again until the month of December, and meanwhile you would be processing a 100 rental agreements for the rototiller, cleaning it 100 times, billing it 100 times, writing rental agreements 100 times — and you would need people to handle it all.

So really understand, truly understand what your business is all about. Don’t try to operate the business yourself. I see owners out there erecting tents and fixing equipment. What they ought to be doing is getting into this and thinking about how they could improve the business — using their brains to make more money instead of using their hands to try to save a few bucks. 


February 2001